At issue is the desire for a single regulatory body to oversee the complex fledgling industry. Currently, at least seven agencies regulate various aspects, giving rise to sometimes contradictory guidelines. The state’s licensing system has come under heavy criticism and litigation for delays, inconsistent scoring of applications, and non-responsiveness to applicants with questions about the process.

So most business operators agree there should be one body to issue licenses, set guidelines and mete out discipline, as in most other states that have legalized marijuana. The dispute is over what that single overseer would look like.

One one side, the Cannabis Business Association of Illinois is lobbying for a cannabis commission, with five to nine bipartisan members appointed by the governor, similar to the Illinois Gaming Board or the Illinois Liquor Control Commission.

It would hold monthly public meetings, publish agendas and minutes, and be subject to the Freedom of Information Act.

On the other side of the argument, members of groups such as the Cannabis Equity IL Coalition, Chicago NORML and the Illinois Independent Craft Growers Association prefer one agency to oversee all aspects of the business, including growers, dispensaries, transporters and infusers.

“Transparency and public access” are the reasons for a commission, according to Pam Althoff, spokeswoman for the Cannabis Business Association of Illinois. “It would allow the public to know exactly what’s going on in the industry, and for stakeholders to have access in a public forum for a nascent industry that still needs great guidance, and a little more nimbleness.”